CRY FREEDOM.net
Welcome to cryfreedom.net,
formerly known as Womens
Liberation Front.
A website
that hopes to draw and keeps your attention for both the global 21th. century 3rd. feminist revolution as well
as especially for the Zan, Zendegi, Azadi uprising in Iran and the
struggles of our sisters in other parts of the Middle East. This online magazine
that started December 2019 will
be published every week. Thank you for your time and interest.
Click here for the
Iran 'Woman, Life, Freedom' section
Updated August 16, 2024
|
|
SPECIAL
REPORTS PALESTINE
FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA - FREE PALESTINE
August
wk3bis -- August
wk3 P4 --
August wk3 P3 --
August wk3 P2 --
August
wk3 -- August
2 P2 -- August
wk2 -- August
wk1 P2 --
August wk1 --
Click here for an overview by week in 2024
Special reports: TRIBUTES TO MOTHERS AND CHILDREN
|
July 12, 2024
|
August 20 - 18, 2024 |
Additional
stories of utmost interest: |
August 17 - 16, 2024 |
June 14, 2024 |
|
May 23, 2024 |
When one hurts or kills a women
one hurts or kills hummanity and is an antrocitie.
Gino d'Artali
and: My mother (1931-1997) always said to me <Mi
figlio, non esistono notizie <vecchie> perche puoi imparare qualcosa da
qualsiasi notizia.> Translated: <My son, there is no such thing as so
called 'old' news because you can learn something from any news.>
Gianna d'Artali.
Al Jazeera - Le Monde - August 18, 2024 - by Samer
Jaber political activist and researcher
<<Solidarity with Palestine must be about decolonisation, not just
ceasefire
The global pro-Palestinian movement must not fall for short-term goals
that do not address Palestinian demands for justice and freedom.
It has been more than 10 months now of Israel waging its genocidal war
on Gaza. Throughout this time, mobilisation in solidarity with the
Palestinian people has ebbed and flowed but it has not stopped. Large
crowds have rallied across the world to protest inaction by world
leaders on Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity. As we
approach a year of genocidal warfare, important questions are emerging
about the way forward for the Palestinian solidarity movement. In my
conversations with various pro-Palestinian activists, one theme has
emerged: the urgent need to shift the movement's goal from stopping the
war to decolonising Palestine. That is because a ceasefire will not end
the genocidal violence Palestinians face.
The limitations of antiwar marches
Mobilisation against the war started almost as soon as Israel launched
its aggression on Gaza. One of the slogans most often raised was
"Ceasefire Now!" as a broad-based antiwar movement came together. Given
the urgency of the moment, the ceasefire goal was the bare minimum that
allowed for bringing different groups together, Huwaida Arraf, a
cofounder of the International Solidarity Movement, told me. She pointed
out that this did not mean that the pro-Palestinian movement should
limit itself to this objective. But the demand for a ceasefire has
remained the dominant call of public demonstrations throughout the past
10 months, severely limiting the scope of the protest movement. It
seemingly implies that protests will stop once a ceasefire is announced.
Yet we all know that the suffering of the Palestinian people under
Israeli occupation and apartheid will not end when Israel stops
bombarding Gaza indiscriminately. Another problem with antiwar marches
is that they often end up favouring certain agendas. Some activists I
spoke to pointed out that such events often accommodate representatives
of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and reflect its perspective. The PA
prefers a negotiated peace settlement and collaboration with Israel,
which will not address the Palestinian demands for justice, the right of
return to their homeland, etc. Another issue with these demonstrations
is that while they show the size and strength of the pro-Palestinian
movement, they also often turn most participants into mere spectators.
While people march, listen to speeches, and express their enthusiasm,
the organisers tend to monopolise the message and direction of the
movement. Ali, a British political observer, who asked that I do not use
his last name, highlighted the implications of this approach saying,
"You can notice that individuals with close ties to organisers are
sometimes given a platform to introduce themselves as candidates during
antiwar demonstrations, while others equally committed to ending the war
are not afforded the same opportunity. Such practices create an uneven
playing field that disadvantages truly dedicated individuals,
undermining the inclusivity and effectiveness of the movement." While
protests play a vital role in expressing public dissent, their
effectiveness in influencing international or external political issues
can be limited. In some cases, protests act as a pressure valve, letting
public frustration out without impacting policy.
Moving beyond the call for a ceasefire
Instead of focusing on a ceasefire, the pro-Palestinian protest movement
should embrace demands for decolonisation. It needs to place the
Palestinian question back into an anticolonial framework and reaffirm
its place within the history of the decolonisation struggle. This
entails deconstructing the delusion of the peace process promoted by the
United States. This decades-long process has not only failed to bring
actual peace and protect Palestinian rights, but it has also created the
false impression that this is a conflict between equal sides rather than
between a coloniser and the colonised. It distracts from the reality of
occupation and apartheid in which Palestinians live. It is also
important to link the discourse of decolonisation to the right to
self-determination and liberation, which are guaranteed by the UN
Charter and international law. This approach is crucial to counter
Israeli propaganda that this is a struggle between Muslim extremists and
a civilised Israel and that the supporters of the Palestinians are
anti-Semitic. Recently, this propaganda has been used to paint
pro-Palestinian protests as dangerous to Jewish communities and conflate
them with racist, anti-immigrant riots, leading to calls to shut them
down. That is why it is important to point out that calls for
decolonisation are legitimate and have legal justification under
international law. The decolonisation framework also helps elevate the
Palestinian question to a broader issue of justice. It helps people
recognise the connections between their own economic hardship and
political marginalisation and the suffering of the Palestinians under
colonial rule. This makes the struggle for justice and peace for
Palestinians a platform that gives communities visibility and power.
This dynamic is particularly evident in immigrant-descendant communities
in the United Kingdom and France and Black and Hispanic communities in
the United States. The participation of the Jewish community can also
play a crucial role in transforming the pro-Palestinian movement from
simply stopping the war to a broader decolonisation effort. This
transformation goes beyond proving that the anticolonial movement is not
anti-Semitic and giving Jews a voice to tell Israel, "You cannot commit
crimes in our name." The decolonisation movement will provide a platform
for the Jewish community to advocate for coexistence between Jews and
Palestinians in one democratic state based on equal citizenship. This
position will contribute to dismantling the colonial ideology of the
Zionist enterprise, paving the way for a more just solution.
An effective protest movement
Israeli historian and activist Ilan Pappe recently argued that Israel's
extremism reflects the reality that Zionism’s final chapter is
unfolding. While I share his perspective, I believe optimism shouldn't
be based solely on Israel's internal contradictions. Our focus should be
on developing effective strategies for decolonising Palestine. True
liberation won't come from Israel's internal collapse but from a
successful Palestinian decolonisation struggle. So what would that look
like?
Student activism provides a good example. As a grassroots movement, it
empowers members to participate democratically in decision-making
processes, precluding the possibility of gatekeepers emerging and taking
control of narratives and actions. At the same time, given the large
size of the student population in any country, student protests can
mobilise significant numbers and thus hold major leverage over
educational institutions and local authorities. The student protests in
the US earlier this year made clear how effective such activism can be.
They did not just call for a ceasefire and an end to military aid for
Israel. Instead, they made local and tangible demands within the
anticolonial framework: divestment by their universities from any
companies that support Israeli colonisation and cutting off
collaboration with Israeli institutions. Students were able to spur
their own professors and local communities into action. A significant
number of academics felt compelled to declare their anticolonial stance
and engage with the student movement. At the same time, many student
protests, especially in urban environments, received community support
thanks to effective outreach activities. The campus demonstrations were
effective because they targeted elite institutions that produce the next
generations of technocrats, corporate leaders, and political
decision-makers. This directly challenged the Israeli government's
<commanding heights> strategy, which focuses on influencing leaders to
ensure support for Israel. The spread of the student protests and their
mass appeal pushed the student movement beyond the ability of the
establishment to contain it. It now has the potential to transform
itself into a popular movement with the capacity to influence popular
culture and lifestyles.
Mobilisation and grassroots work
The student movement can chart the way forward for other mobilisations.
One place to look is the labour movement.
Although many workers' unions across Western Europe have expressed
solidarity with Palestine and called for a ceasefire, this position has
not translated into concrete actions that put pressure on their
governments to stop arming Israel and withdraw their support for it.
Stewart, a UK activist I spoke to who did not want to provide his last
name, emphasised that labour unions can play an important role in ending
the war and starting the decolonisation of Palestine. Their strength
lies in organising boycott initiatives, such as workers refusing to load
ships or aeroplanes that supply arms to Israel, which can match to a
certain extent the "disruptive" impact that student movements had.
Other movements that can learn from student mobilisation include the
various initiatives to exert political pressure on governments and
parties through conditional voting in local and national elections. In
the US, the "Uncommitted" and "Abandon Biden" movements are pressuring
the Democratic Party to shift its stance on Israel in exchange for votes
from certain communities in the upcoming November elections. The
challenge with this approach is that not voting could potentially result
in a second Trump administration, which would be highly detrimental to
the Palestinian cause.
To navigate this situation, the pro-Palestinian movement in the US
should focus on advocating for specific, achievable objectives both
before and after the election. This is particularly important because
the new Democratic presidential candidate, Kamala Harris, appears to be
responsive to the demands of protesters. Furthermore, promoting certain
candidates in any election just because they support Palestine is
myopic. People generally prioritise daily concerns over foreign policy
when they cast their ballots. This was evident in the latest UK
election, where voters were primarily focused on internal socioeconomic
issues. That is why it is crucial that these campaigns - just like the
student movement - build wide networks of support by making clear the
links between the plight of the Palestinians and the oppression of
various other communities - the working class, immigrants, etc. Support
for the Palestinian struggle should be connected to other progressive
policies that address impoverishment, racism, inadequate social
provision, the urgent need for a green transition, etc.
The role of the Palestinians
In all of this, the Palestinian civil society, encompassing social
movements, trade unions, popular committees, and public figures both
within Palestine and the diaspora, can play a key role. The Palestinian
anticolonial narrative and strategic alliances with global civil society
initiatives should be driven by Palestinian civil society itself, much
like the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement that gained
momentum during the second Intifada, Salah al-Khawaja, a co-founder and
leader of the Popular Committee against the Wall and Settlements, told
me. This narrative and these alliances are essential for leading the
global solidarity movement within the framework of decolonisation.
Efforts are already under way to unite various Palestinian civil society
actors. The author of this article is coleading efforts at the
international level. This proposed alliance aims to achieve two key
objectives. First, it seeks to solidify the understanding that the
Palestinian struggle is part of a broader fight for global freedom and
justice against all forms of colonialism, racism, warmongering and
discrimination. Second, it aims to empower Palestinian civil society to
take the lead in framing the movement politically. A unified Palestinian
civil society can more effectively promote the decolonisation narrative
and highlight a proposed settlement of the conflict with Israel in which
one democratic state is established with equal citizenship for Israelis
and Palestinians. By assuming this leadership role, the Palestinian
civil society can guide the global pro-Palestinian movement and give
Palestinians a voice that is not coopted or serving a certain agenda.
The genocide in Gaza and the global mobilisation against it have put the
Palestinian struggle at an important juncture. It is essential for
Palestinians and their allies to seize this moment and push for a
solution that dismantles colonial structures and establishes a single,
democratic state where all citizens, regardless of ethnicity or
religion, are equal.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not
necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.>>
Source:
https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/8/18/solidarity-with-palestine-must-be-about-decolonisation-not-just-ceasefire
Women's
Liberation Front 2019/cryfreedom.net 2024