|
CRY
FREEDOM.net
|
![]()
2026: Jan
wk3P4 -- Jan wk3P3 -- Jan wk3P3 -- Jan wk3P2 -- Jan wk3 -- Jan wk2P6 -- Jan wk2P5 -- Jan wk2P4 -- Jan wk2P3 -- Jan wk2P2 -- Jan wk2 -- Jan wk1P3 -- Jan wk1P2 --
Jan
wk1
2025 Dec
wk5P3 -- Dec wk5P2 -- Dec wk5 -- Dec wk4P7 -- Dec wk4P6 -- Dec wk4P5 -- Dec wk4P4 -- Dec wk4P3 -- Dec wk4P2 -- Dec wk4 -- Dec wk3P7 -- Dec wk3P6 -- Dec wk2P5 -- Dec wk3P4 -- Dec wk3P3 -- Dec wk3P2 -- Dec wk3 -- Dec wk2P6 -- Dec wk2P5 -- Dec wk2P4 -- Dec wk2P3 -- Dec wk2P2 -- Dec wk2 -- Dec wk1P7-6 -- Dec wk1P5 -- Dec wk1P4 -- Dec wk1P3 -- Dec wk1P2 -- Dec wk1 --
Click here for an overview by week in 2025
|
|
|
|
Click here for an
overview of October
7, 2025 |
|
When one hurts
or kills a women
one hurts or kills hummanity and is an antrocitie.
Gino d'Artali
and: My mother (1931-1997) always said to me <Mi figlio, non esistono
notizie <vecchie> perche puoi imparare qualcosa da qualsiasi
notizia.> Translated: <My son, there is no such thing as so called
'old' news because you can learn something from any news.>
Gianna d'Artali.
VICTORY is on its way to the
sea -- Screengrab Al Jazeera: Wanted
for genocide - Guilty as Charged - rubio virus

Olive tree -
Symbol of Palestine
- Did you eat today -
Boy shouts FOOD and PEACE NOW - GO AWAY you mercenaries
of the usa/isr/idf/ghf devils!!!!

Mahmoud Khalil
Quds news - Jan 15, 2026
{US Appeals Court Reverses Decision That Freed Mahmoud Khalil
The ruling revived the possibility that Khalil could again be detained
as the Trump administration pursues his deportation.
New York (QNN)- A federal appeals court on Thursday reversed a lower
court decision that ordered the release of the former Columbia
University graduate student and pro-Palestine activist Mahmoud
Khalil from immigration detention, as part of Trump’s administration
efforts to deport him. The Philadelphia-based Third US Circuit Court of
Appeals, in a 2-1 ruling, found that federal immigration law stripped
the trial court of authority to consider Khalil’s challenge to his
detention and ordered the case dismissed. The ruling revived the
possibility that Khalil could again be detained as the Trump
administration pursues his deportation. Khalil is a permanent resident
and recent Columbia University graduate who became a prominent figure in
pro-Palestinian campus activism amid the Israeli genocide, helping to
organize protests and encampments calling for a ceasefire and an end to
US support for Israel. His detention by the ICE last year at his
department drew widespread criticism over the Trump administration’s
crackdown on pro-Palestinian speech. The Trump administration claimed
his presence threatened US foreign policy without providing evidence,
but Judge Michael E. Farbiarz of the Federal District Court in Newark,
New Jersey, ordered his release on bail in June and barred the
government from detaining or deporting him. Khalil accused the Trump
administration of seeking to silence pro-Palestine voices by trying to
re-detain him, after his attorneys appeared in October before the Third
Circuit Court of Appeals to challenge the legality of his detention.
Khalil’s legal team asked judges to uphold lower court rulings that
found the government’s actions likely unconstitutional and ordered his
release on bail. Khalil was the first in a wave of student protest
leaders and international academics arrested under a Trump
administration crackdown on pro-Palestine and anti-genocide activism.
While in detention, Khalil missed the birth of his first child.} Video -
Source: https://qudsnen.co/post?id=67071&slug=us-appeals-court-reverses-decision-that-freed-mahmoud-khalil

Videoscreen grab: Israel’s genocide
Al Jazeera - Jan 15, 2026 - By Hassan Ben Imran - Member of the
Governing Council of Law for Palestine.
{The UK is taking political prisoners to evade accountability for
genocide
The use of anti-terror law against Palestine Action is designed to block
legal and political scrutiny of the UK’s role in Gaza. In June 2025, the
UK government proscribed the UK-based group Palestine Action as a
terrorist organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000. This was not a
security decision, but a political one, marking an unprecedented
escalation in the criminalisation of Palestine solidarity in the United
Kingdom. Palestine Action members have engaged in non-violent direct
action aimed at disrupting the UK’s complicity in the Gaza genocide,
targeting facilities linked to Israel’s arms industry operating in the
UK, including Elbit Systems sites and elements of British military
infrastructure. Rather than confronting its own actions, the government
has sought to divert attention from the central issue: the UK’s role in
the Gaza genocide. Throughout Israel’s assault on Gaza, the UK has
provided sustained political and diplomatic support, supplied vital
components for F-35 fighter jets, and conducted R1 surveillance flights
over Gaza. Taken together, these actions render the British government
not merely complicit, but materially involved in the violence itself. At
the same time, the UK has sought to obstruct international
accountability. It has attempted to interfere with proceedings at the
International Criminal Court — conduct that may constitute an offence
under Article 70(1) of the ICC Statute — by intimidating the ICC
Prosecutor and creating procedural obstacles designed to delay or
prevent the issuance of arrest warrants against Israeli leaders. Rather
than reassessing policies that expose it to legal and moral liability,
the government has turned on those who insist on holding it to its own
professed values — values it readily invokes when geopolitically
convenient, such as in Ukraine and Greenland.
Anti-terror laws to justify political imprisonment
The persecution of individuals on political grounds through the law is
by no means new. As early as 399 BCE, Socrates was tried and executed in
Athens on charges of “impiety”, “not recognising the gods the state
recognises”, and “corrupting the youth”, with the law itself serving as
the instrument of repression. Today, Russia’s crackdown on dissent,
carried out through formally lawful means, stands as one of the most
widely criticised contemporary examples of political imprisonment,
routinely condemned by Western governments, including the UK. Attempts
to define and legally operationalise the concept of political
imprisonment have long faced resistance. While there is no consensus on
what constitutes a “political prisoner” or “prisoner of conscience”, the
criteria established by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of
Europe (PACE), of which the UK is a member, offer clear and
authoritative guidance:
“a. if the detention has been imposed in violation of one of the
fundamental guarantees set out in the European Convention on Human
Rights and its Protocols (ECHR), in particular freedom of thought,
conscience and religion, freedom of expression and information, freedom
of assembly and association;
b. if the detention has been imposed for purely political reasons
without connection to any offence;
c. if, for political motives, the length of the detention or its
conditions are clearly out of proportion to the offence the person has
been found guilty of or is suspected of;
d. if, for political motives, he or she is detained in a discriminatory
manner as compared to other persons; or,
e. if the detention is the result of proceedings which were clearly
unfair and this appears to be connected with political motives of the
authorities.” (SG/Inf(2001)34, paragraph 10).
These criteria are directly relevant to the UK’s treatment of Palestine
Action. The British government is complicit in Israel’s systematic
unmaking of Palestine, including its illegal occupation, its system of
apartheid, and its role in the Gaza genocide, and Palestine Action has
directly challenged this complicity. Where public order and civil
disobedience laws once failed to suppress this activism, the state
escalated to the use of exceptional anti-terror legislation. The
government has since resorted to the Terrorism Act to preemptively
criminalise activists and expose them to sentences of up to 14 years’
imprisonment, a level of punishment grossly disproportionate to
non-violent direct action. This disproportionality and choice of
legislation signal a political motive. The application of the Terrorism
Act 2000 to non-violent direct action strips activists of ordinary legal
protections and subjects them to an exceptional penal regime, including
extended pre-charge detention, heightened surveillance powers,
restrictions on association and expression, and dramatically increased
sentencing exposure. Such measures are ordinarily reserved for acts
involving mass violence, not protest aimed at preventing harm. Under the
PACE criteria, detention may be considered political where punishment is
clearly disproportionate or where legal proceedings are unfair and
politically motivated. Here, non-violent activism is met with the
prospect of lengthy imprisonment alongside reputational destruction
through terrorist designation. This combination satisfies multiple
indicators of political imprisonment, particularly criteria (c) and (e).
The use of anti-terror law in this context does not merely criminalise
conduct; it redefines dissent itself as a security threat, preempting
fair adjudication and conditioning the public to accept extraordinary
punishment for ordinary political opposition.
The broader picture
In penology, a penal system may serve several recognised purposes,
including just deserts and retribution, incapacitation, and deterrence.
What is unfolding in the UK fits none of these aims. Instead, the penal
system is being deployed to expand executive power and suppress
political opposition, deviating from the purposes a penal system in a
liberal democracy should serve. The UK is complicit in grave violations
of international law and has not only failed to meet its international
legal obligations, but has actively breached them. Some British
citizens, concerned with justice, international law, and human rights,
have peacefully stepped in to challenge their government’s wrongdoing.
The state’s response has been to criminalise dissent while presenting
repression as democratic self-defence. Let us be clear: proscribing
Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation is not an isolated act. It
is part of the UK’s broader complicity in Israel’s oppression and
genocide, and it functions domestically to silence those who seek to
disrupt that complicity. This is not the first attempt to rule by law in
the UK to support Israel’s policies in Palestine. The introduction of
the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism was another such attempt to control
and intimidate opposition through legal means. With the weaponisation of
anti-terror laws, the UK government has taken a further step towards
shrinking the space for dissent. The exceptional selectivity of legal
tools and the disproportionality of the chosen penal regime cannot be
justified when measured against the conduct in question: non-violent
activism aimed at compelling the government to halt violence and uphold
the international legal obligations it claims to champion. Those
participating in violence are branding the non-violent as terrorists.
Finally, it is striking that after all these decades, the UK continues
to ignore its unique historical responsibility towards the Palestinians.
The UK imposed its mandate over Palestine by force, governing the
territory while systematically privileging colonial and settler
interests, before abandoning its obligations and withdrawing
unilaterally. This withdrawal was crucial to creating the conditions in
which the Nakba unfolded, in breach of the responsibilities the UK had
assumed under the Mandate. Among those obligations was the commitment
articulated in the White Paper of 1939 to establish a Palestinian state
for all its citizens within 10 years, a promise that was never honoured.
The UK planted the seeds of Palestinian suffering and then exited
Palestine without securing political self-determination for its
indigenous people, leaving a legacy of dispossession that continues to
shape the present. More than a century after the Mandate, it remains
Palestinians — supported by allies across the world — who are risking
everything to defend the values of humanity and the principles of
international law. The British state, by contrast, has chosen evasion
over responsibility, and repression over reckoning.
Any hopes?
Hope lies in refusing the normalisation of this moment. By challenging
the proscription of Palestine Action, activists are not only resisting
the UK’s complicity in Israel’s crimes, but defending the space for
dissent itself. The struggle is not simply to reverse one decision, but
to prevent the erosion of democratic limits through the misuse of law.
In the UK right now, defending democracy and acting against complicity
in Israeli atrocities go hand in hand.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not
necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance. } Video - Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/1/15/the-uk-is-taking-political-prisoners-to-evade-accountability-for-genocide

Videoscreen grab: Israel’s genocide
Al Jazeera - Jan 15, 2026
{Timeline of Israel’s genocide on Gaza
The Trump administration has announced its ceasefire plan for Gaza is
now in ‘Phase Two’, following 27 months of death, displacement and
destruction in Israel’s genocide.} Video - Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/1/15/timeline-of-israels-genocide-on-gaza

Videoscreen grab: Down with America
Al Jazeera - Jan 15, 2026
{What’s behind anti-US chants, from Iran to South America
“Down with America” has been among the chants heard in global protests
from Iran to Latin America. US thinking has often blamed this animosity
on ‘hating our freedoms’, but that explanation ignores the US’s frequent
abuse of power.} Video - Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/1/15/whats-behind-anti-us-chants-from-iran-to-south-america
Quds news - Jan 15, 2026
{Israel Signals No Intention to Withdraw From So-Called “Yellow Line”
Despite US Push for Phase Two of Gaza Ceasefire: Israeli Media
The Israeli Public Broadcasting Corporation, known as Kan, reported on
Thursday that Israeli officials consider the so-called yellow line as a
strategic area that will remain under Israeli control.
Gaza (QNN)- Israel has no intention of withdrawing from the so-called
“Yellow Line,” which roughly divides Gaza in half, according to Israeli
media, despite the US announcing on Wednesday the launch of the second
phase of Trump-brokered plan to end Israel’s genocidal war against
Palestinians. Until progress is made in all matters related to the
disarmament of Hamas, Israel has no plans to withdraw from the Yellow
Line in the eastern Gaza Strip. This was announced on Thursday on the
"This Morning" program with Ilael Shahar, on Channel 2's News. The
Israeli Public Broadcasting Corporation, known as Kan, reported on
Thursday that Israeli officials consider the so-called yellow line as a
strategic area that will remain under Israeli control. On Wednesday, the
US announced the start of the second phase of Trump’s Gaza ceasefire
plan, saying phase one “delivered historic humanitarian aid and
maintained the ceasefire”, despite Israel having violated the agreement
more than 1,200 times, killing hundreds of civilians and blocking
much-needed aid from entering the enclave. US President Donald Trump’s
special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff announced the launch of
the second phase, “moving from ceasefire to demilitarization,
technocratic governance, and reconstruction”. Witkoff said in a social
media post that the second phase will establish a transitional
administration to govern over the bombarded Palestinian territory and
see the “full demilitarization and reconstruction of Gaza”. An adviser
to the head of Hamas’s political bureau told Al Jazeera on Thursday that
discussions in Cairo are focusing on reopening the Rafah crossings,
ensuring the entry of aid currently stockpiled on the Egyptian side of
the border and securing an Israeli withdrawal. Taher al-Nunu said Hamas
“must work with mediators and the international community to achieve
calm and a return to normalcy in Gaza” and praised the “great efforts”
being made to implement what was agreed upon. Al-Nunu also accused
Israel of attempting to derail the ceasefire and said Hamas was “working
with mediators to open the crossings, allow aid in and secure the
withdrawal of occupation forces from the Gaza Strip”.
On October 10, the Israeli forces completed the first phase of
withdrawal under the ceasefire deal to the “yellow line,” a non-physical
demarcation line separating the Israeli occupation forces from certain
areas of Gaza, while occupying roughly 53 percent of the Strip. Israeli
forces have been reportedly expanding the so-called “yellow line” in
eastern Gaza, particularly in eastern Gaza City’s Tuffah, Shujayea, and
Zeitoun neighbourhoods, squeezing Palestinians into ever smaller
clusters of the enclave. There was no mention from Witkoff in the
initial statement about Israeli withdrawal or allowing critical
humanitarian aid and critical supplies into Gaza. In December, Israeli
Defense Minister Israel Katz said the Israeli military will never
withdraw from the war-torn Gaza Strip, confirming earlier comments about
settlement construction. “In Gaza, Israel will never fully withdraw –
there will be a significant security area inside the Strip, even after
we move to stage two [of Trump’s 20-point peace plan] if Hamas disarms,”
Katz said during a conference, the Times of Israel reported. Earlier,
Katz spoke about establishing illegal settlements in Gaza, about 20
years after Israel withdrew from the devastated territory. “We are
located deep inside Gaza, and we will never leave all of Gaza,” Katz
said. “We are there to protect.” “In due course, we will establish Nahal
[an Israeli infantry brigade] outposts in northern Gaza in place of the
settlements that were uprooted,” Katz added.} Video - Source: https://qudsnen.co/post?id=67069&slug=israel-signals-no-intention-to-withdraw-from-so-called-yellow-line-despite-us-push-for-phase-two-of-gaza-ceasefire-israeli-media

Videoscreen grab: ceasefire - really?
Al Jazeera - Jan 15, 2026
{Gaza’s ceasefire moves to next phase, but is it working?
The US has announced the Gaza ceasefire is moving to phase two, where
“demilitarisation, technocratic governance, and reconstruction” will be
the focus. But did Israel and Hamas abide by phase one? Soraya Lennie
breaks down what’s happened.} Video - Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/1/15/gazas-ceasefire-moves-to-next-phase-but-is-it-working

Videoscreen grab: A mothers' Grief
Al Jazeera - Jan 15, 2026
{Israel carries out raids and demolitions, arrests dozens across West
Bank
One Palestinian man is shot and wounded, and at least 80 people are
detained in mass overnight raids in the occupied territory. The Israeli
military has launched raids and interrogations ensnaring more than 80
people across the occupied West Bank, wounding at least one man and
demolishing the home of another as Israel escalates its attacks on the
Palestinian territory in tandem with its ongoing genocidal war in Gaza.
In one incident on Thursday, Israeli forces surrounded a home in Dura,
south of the city of Hebron, before shooting and wounding the brother of
Mahmoud al-Fasfous. The al-Fasfous brothers have long been wanted by
Israeli forces and have faced frequent raids of the family home and
soldier assaults. In another raid in Hebron’s Khallat Nafisa area,
Israeli forces sealed off the area from civilians before destroying the
home of Imran al-Atrash with a bulldozer, the Palestinian news agency
Wafa reported. Israeli forces killed al-Atrash and another Palestinian,
Walid Muhammad Khalil Sabarna, in mid-November when the duo was accused
of carrying out a car-ramming and stabbing attack that killed one
Israeli settler and injured three. The Israeli military posted photos of
the demolition on Telegram, claiming that al-Atrash was a “terrorist”
and cheering the effort to destroy his home.
Escalating arrest campaign
Elsewhere in Hebron and the occupied West Bank, Israeli forces detained
and interrogated at least 80 Palestinians during overnight and dawn
raids, the Palestinian Prisoner’s Society reported. At least one woman
and two children were among those detained along with former prisoners.
“This represents an unprecedented escalation since the beginning of the
year, described as part of a campaign of collective punishment,” the
group said, adding that field interrogations have “become the
occupation’s most prominent policy”. Two arrests took place during a
raid on the Arroub refugee camp, located north of Hebron, with other
arrests under way in virtually all areas surrounding the city, Wafa
reported. In the al-Majaz community of Masafer Yatta, a collection of
hamlets in the South Hebron Hills, Israeli forces plundered homes before
converting one into a military outpost, forcing its inhabitants to spend
the night outside in the cold.
Meanwhile, in the Ramallah and el-Bireh governorate, soldiers stormed
the town of Kobar and fanned out across multiple neighbourhoods.
Townspeople told Al Jazeera that the soldiers tried to provoke residents
by shouting: “Who wants to become a martyr? Where are the cowards?”
Israel has stepped up its raids on the occupied West Bank – including
injuring dozens of Palestinians with live rounds and grenades at a
prominent university earlier this month – amid a formal push to annex
the territory. Israeli settlers have rampaged in Palestinian lands,
killing and beating Palestinian civilians, including the elderly, and
destroying their property with impunity, often backed by the Israeli
military. Throughout 2025, Israeli settlers or soldiers killed 240
Palestinians in the West Bank, the United Nations Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said last week. Israeli
forces killed 225 people while settlers killed at least nine. The agency
could not confirm whether settlers or soldiers caused the remaining six
deaths.
Fifty-five of those killed – nearly one-quarter of the total – were
children.
During the same period, Palestinians killed 17 Israelis in the West
Bank, including one child and six members of Israeli forces, OCHA
reported. All of Israel’s settlements in the West Bank and occupied East
Jerusalem, populated by about 700,000 Israelis, are illegal under
international law. The UN has repeatedly called for Israel to dismantle
the settlements and said the system resembles apartheid.} Video -
Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/15/israel-carries-out-raids-and-demolitions-arrests-dozens-across-west-bank
Al Jazeera - Jan 15, 2026 - Mohammad Mansour
{Who is Nickolay Mladenov, the diplomat tasked with ‘disarming Gaza’?
As the US launches ‘Phase Two’, the former UN envoy heads to Cairo to
meet Palestinian faction leaders, leading a fraught plan to replace
Hamas with a technocratic administration. The search for a figure to
lead post-war Gaza, which lies in ruins from Israel’s genocidal war, has
moved from diplomatic backrooms to the negotiating tables in Cairo.
Following the Arab veto of the regionally toxic former British leader
Tony Blair, Washington has deployed its Plan B, Nickolay Mladenov, as
the push for phase two of the fragile ceasefire gains some momentum. The
53-year-old former Bulgarian foreign minister and defence minister is no
longer just a nominee; he is arguably the most critical figure in the
newly launched phase two of the ceasefire, which Israel has violated on
a daily basis since October 10. Mladenov has been confirmed as the
director-general of the United States-proposed “Board of Peace”. His
mandate is to oversee the transition from Hamas rule to a new
technocratic administration led by Ali Shaath, a former Palestinian
Authority (PA) deputy minister. For five years from 2015-2020, Mladenov
served as the United Nations’ top envoy to the region, earning a
reputation as a “firefighter” who could talk to everyone. Now, he
returns with a far more fraught and potentially explosive mission:
Implementing a US-designed plan that explicitly calls for the
“disarmament of all unauthorised personnel” – a euphemism for ending
Hamas’s military power while Israel continues its occupation.
The mediator’s test
Mladenov’s immediate challenge is not just reconstruction, but
high-stakes mediation. His itinerary, which includes meetings with
leaders of Palestinian factions in Cairo, highlights why he was chosen:
He is one of the few international figures who retains lines of
communication with all sides while holding the trust of Washington and
Israel. While US special envoy Steve Witkoff has framed phase two as an
effort to “create the alternative to Hamas”, Mladenov’s role is to make
that alternative function on the ground. He is tasked with supervising
the new “technocratic committee” headed by Shaath, which will manage
daily life for two million war-battered Palestinians who have lost
family members, their homes, hospitals and schools in relentless Israeli
bombardment. However, this structure will face a crisis of legitimacy.
Mladenov must navigate a landscape where Israel controls a “buffer zone”
in the east, more than 50 percent of the whole territory, and refuses to
withdraw fully – all while he attempts to sell a governance plan to the
very factions he is tasked with disarming.
A ‘technocrat’ in a war zone
Mladenov’s appointment signals Washington’s preference for a managerial
solution to a military and political crisis. In his recent post-UN
career, Mladenov has championed a “new model” for the Middle East,
defined by “cutting-edge innovation” and technological partnerships. He
has spoken enthusiastically about the region shifting from “oil barrels
to silicon chips”. Critics, however, argue that this worldview presents
a mismatch for Gaza’s current reality. As the Strip enters the second
phase, the needs are existential, not technological. The displaced
population is living in flimsy tents in extreme weather, dependent on
humanitarian aid that Israel largely blocks, and navigating a landscape
of rubble. There is a concern among humanitarian experts that Mladenov’s
mandate – tied to high-level “Board of Peace” politics – may be divorced
from the gritty requirements of a starving population. The risk is of an
administrator focused on a “Davos-style” future while the present
remains mired in catastrophe.
A shift in alignment
While Mladenov is often cited as a “fair broker” trusted by both
Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the PA, his post-UN
career suggests a subtle but significant realignment. Since 2021, he has
served as director-general of the Anwar Gargash Diplomatic Academy in
Abu Dhabi. In this capacity, he has become a vocal proponent of the
“Abraham Accords” – the normalisation agreements between Israel and
several Arab states – framing them as a “supercharge” for regional
stability. This perspective places him firmly within the strategic orbit
of some Gulf states and US President Donald Trump’s administration.
While this connection may help secure funding for reconstruction, it
complicates his standing on the Palestinian street, where the accords
are often viewed as the diplomatic architecture that allowed
Palestinians’ plight to be sidelined.
The mandate: Neutrality vs enforcement
The specific nature of phase two could make Mladenov’s job nigh
impossible. In his previous role, Mladenov reported to the UN
secretary-general and was bound to uphold international law. In his new
role, he answers to a US-led board that heavily leans into the Israeli
narrative of its “security demands”, specifically the “disarmament of
all unauthorised personnel”. Mladenov must now persuade Palestinian
factions to engage with a “technocratic” promise of governance, overseen
by a diplomat who has spent the last few years advocating for
Arab-Israeli normalisation. As he engages in talks, Mladenov enters this
role not merely as a mediator, but as the implementer of a complex
international roadmap. It is a mandate shaped in Washington and
supported by Gulf financing, yet one that will likely have to be
realised under the entrenched constraints of an ongoing Israeli military
presence in Gaza.} Video - Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/1/15/who-is-nickolay-mladenov-the-diplomat-tasked-with-disarming-gaza
Al Jazeera - Jan 15, 2026 - Mohammad Mansour
{Wary of Israeli appropriation, Palestine lists 14 sites with UNESCO
Palestinian Authority submits files for Gaza’s Old City and West Bank
landmarks to United Nations’ World Heritage list as it aims to protect
its cultural heritage from Israeli attacks and appropriation. For
Palestinians maintaining their land and heritage, which is under Israeli
occupation since 1948, became a national priority. The Palestinian
Authority has formally moved to register 14 new cultural and natural
sites on UNESCO’s World Heritage tentative list in a bid to safeguard
its cultural and historical sites from Israeli appropriation and
attacks. “Palestine is not just a space of political conflict, but a
civilisation rooted in human history,” Marwa Adwan, acting
director-general of World Heritage at the Palestinian Ministry of
Tourism, told Al Jazeera. “This diversity is the strongest response to
attempts to monopolise the historical narrative,” she said, referring to
Israeli attempts to appropriate symbols of Palestinian culture and
history.
The submission announced by the Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities on
January 1, aims to grant international recognition to endangered
landmarks across the occupied West Bank and the Gaza Strip, which has
been devastated by Israel’s genocidal war. More than 200 historical
sites were destroyed by Israeli bombing in what experts called a
“cultural genocide“. The new list brings the total number of Palestinian
sites on the tentative list to 24, covering a vast timeline from the
Canaanite city-states dating back to 3,000 BC to Gaza’s Old City.
The 14 submitted sites
The Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities confirmed the full list of sites
submitted to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization (UNESCO). The list spans prehistoric caves, religious
routes, and modern architecture. The sites are:
The historic centre of Gaza, including the Great Omari Mosque and the
Church of Saint Porphyrius
The Byzantine Church of Jabalia (Mukheitim)
Canaanite city-states
The historic city of Nablus and its environs
The Holy Miracles of Jesus Christ in Palestine
Monasteries of the Jerusalem wilderness (El-Bariyah)
Maqamat (shrines) in Palestine
Jerusalem water system Qanat es-Sabeel
Jabal al-Fureidis / Herodium
The Lower Jordan River Valley
Archaeological Palaces of Tulul Abu el-‘Alayiq
Cultural landscape of Wadi Kharitoun prehistoric caves
Dwelling caves (Al-Maghayir) of Palestine
Modern architecture in Palestine
Marwa Adwan, Acting Director General of World Heritage at the
Palestinian Ministry of Tourism [Courtesy of Marwa Adwan]
Marwa Adwan, acting director-general of World Heritage at the
Palestinian Ministry of Tourism [Courtesy of Marwa Adwan]
Saving Gaza’s history
A crucial component of the bid is the protection of heritage in Gaza,
which has faced catastrophic destruction during Israel’s genocidal war.
The list includes the Great Omari Mosque, built nearly 1,400 years ago,
and the Church of Saint Porphyrius, both targeted during Israeli
bombardment. The Greek Orthodox Church was built in 425. Adwan described
the move as a strategic step for the “day after” the war. “Listing sites
like the Great Omari Mosque … is an initial international recognition of
their global value and their urgent need for protection,” she explained.
“We are counting on UNESCO not just for funding, but to document damages
as an international legal source to preserve our cultural rights.”
‘Heritage is a bridge’
The initiative has drawn a sharp response from the Israeli government,
particularly regarding sites located in Area C of the West Bank, such as
Herodium (Jabal al-Fureidis), which is under full Israeli military
control. Area C forms more than 60 percent of the West Bank. According
to Israel’s Channel 14, Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu sent
an urgent letter to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday,
labeling the Palestinian move as “archaeological terrorism”. Eliyahu
demanded the formation of a government task force to block the bid,
arguing it is a “strategic arena for a political struggle” aimed at
seizing sites of “Jewish historical importance”. “Lack of response will
be interpreted in the international arena as silent acceptance,” Eliyahu
warned, claiming the move is a prelude to “international legal
interventions”. Israel has been accused of erasing Palestinian cultural
heritage and weaponising archaeology to appropriate Palestinian land. It
has designated dozens of Palestinian archaeological sites in the
occupied West Bank as “Israeli heritage sites” to grab Palestinians land
and entrench its occupation. The UN General Assembly in September 2024
passed a resolution asking Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian
within a year. The resolution came after the International Court of
Justice ruled that Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories was
unlawful.
Palestinian officials have rejected the Israeli characterisation.
“Heritage is not a weapon, but a bridge,” Adwan told Al Jazeera. “Trying
to link heritage to security or calling it ‘terrorism’ is a deliberate
distortion.” She noted that the files were selected based on technical
criteria to highlight Palestine’s religious and cultural diversity,
including the “Miracles of Jesus” route and the Monasteries of the
Jerusalem Wilderness (El-Bariyah). “This reflects a rare cultural and
religious pluralism that must be preserved for all of humanity,” Adwan
added.
Severing UN ties
The row over heritage unfolds as Israel moves to cut ties with the
United Nations system entirely. On Monday, Israeli Foreign Minister
Gideon Saar announced that Israel would “immediately sever all contact”
with several UN bodies, including UN Women and the Office of the Special
Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict,
citing “anti-Israel bias”. Last year Israel banned the UN Relief and
Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), which is considered a
lifeline for Palestinians in the occupied territories as well as in
neighbouring countries hosting Palestinian refugees. More than 750,000
Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their homeland leading up to
the creation of Israel in 1948. This follows a recent decision from the
administration of US President Donald Trump to withdraw from UNESCO for
a second time. The United States, Israel’s closest regional ally, has
also cut funds to UNRWA. Despite the hostile diplomatic climate, Adwan
insisted the Palestinian bid is a “sovereign right”. “It is not a race
against time,” she said, referring to Israeli settlement expansion. “It
is a strategic step to integrate these sites into protection plans
before it is too late.”} Video - Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/1/15/wary-of-israeli-appropriation-palestine-lists-14-sites-with-unesco
Al Jazeera - Jan 15, 2026
{Gaza plan phase two: US to discuss Hamas disarmament, Israeli
withdrawal
Hamas says the formation of the Palestinian technocratic committee ‘is a
step in the right direction’.to lead post-war Gaza. Hamas leaders and
representatives of other Palestinian factions in Gaza are in the
Egyptian capital Cairo for talks on the second phase of the United
States-led Gaza ceasefire deal, amid a teetering ceasefire that Israel
has repeatedly violated as its genocidal war continues. The Palestinian
group on Thursday welcomed the establishment of a 15-member Palestinian
technocratic committee that would operate under the overall supervision
of a so-called “Board of Peace”, to be chaired by US President Donald
Trump. “The formation of the committee is a step in the right
direction,” said Bassem Naim, a senior Hamas leader. “This is crucial
for consolidating the ceasefire, preventing a return to war, addressing
the catastrophic humanitarian crisis and preparing for comprehensive
reconstruction.” Deep uncertainty remains over the next steps involving
the disarmament of Palestinian armed groups in the Strip, rebuilding and
daily governance. An adviser to the head of Hamas’s political bureau
told Al Jazeera that discussions in Cairo are focusing on reopening the
Rafah crossings, ensuring the entry of aid currently stockpiled on the
Egyptian side of the border and securing an Israeli withdrawal. Taher
al-Nunu said Hamas “must work with mediators and the international
community to achieve calm and a return to normalcy in Gaza” and praised
the “great efforts” being made to implement what was agreed upon.
Al-Nunu also accused Israel of attempting to derail the ceasefire and
said Hamas was “working with mediators to open the crossings, allow aid
in and secure the withdrawal of occupation forces from the Gaza Strip”.
However, the Israeli Public Broadcasting Corporation, known as Kan,
reported that Israeli officials consider the so-called yellow line – a
buffer zone in eastern Gaza – as a strategic area that will remain under
Israeli control. Israel’s current military occupation of Gaza is more
than 50 percent of the besieged enclave. The leaders of Palestinian
armed groups were also scheduled to meet Bulgarian diplomat and
politician Nickolay Mladenov, who will likely head the Board of Peace.
Trump is expected to announce the 15 members of the technocratic
committee in the coming days. Palestinian Vice President Hussein
al-Sheikh welcomed efforts to move ahead with the Gaza plan and argued
that institutions in Gaza should be linked to those run by the
Palestinian Authority (PA) in the West Bank, “upholding the principle of
one system, one law and one legitimate weapon”. In a joint statement,
the other mediators of the ceasefire deal – Egypt, Turkiye and Qatar –
called the announcement an “important development aimed at consolidating
stability and improving the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip”.
They welcomed the establishment of the Palestinian technocratic
committee and said it would be led by Ali Shaath, a former deputy
minister in the PA. The administrative body will be tasked with
providing public services to the more than two million Palestinians in
Gaza, but it faces towering challenges and unanswered questions,
including about its operations and financing. The United Nations has
estimated that reconstruction will cost more than $50bn. The process is
expected to take years, and little money has been pledged so far. Shaath
told local broadcaster Basma Radio on Thursday that the National
Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG) will be fully integrated
with the PA under a “one homeland, one system” framework and that no
foreign members will be included. Its jurisdiction will expand to cover
the entire Gaza Strip as Israeli forces withdraw, Shaath said in the
interview, and there will be no contact between its members and
Palestinian armed groups. Additionally, reconstruction efforts will be
financed via a dedicated World Bank fund supported by Arab and
international donors, with debris used to build artificial islands
through marine land reclamation or recycled for road construction.
Complete debris removal is estimated to take nearly three years under
the proposed strategy, he said. Shaath added that shelters for displaced
Palestinians would be established within the first six months, and that
the repair of desalination plants to obtain potable water and the
rehabilitation of schools and other academic institutions would be a top
priority.} Video - Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/15/gaza-plan-phase-two-us-to-discuss-hamas-disarmament-israeli-withdrawal

Videoscreen grab: Randa Abdel-Fattah
Al Jazeera - Jan 15, 2026 - Lyndal Rowlands
{Australian writers’ festival apologises to Palestinian author after
boycott
Randa Abdel-Fattah said she accepts board’s apology as acknowledgement
of her right to speak about atrocities against Palestinians. An
Australian arts festival has apologised to Randa Abdel-Fattah after it
was forced to cancel its entire writers’ week programme when 180 writers
withdrew from the event in solidarity with the Palestinian Australian
author. The board of Adelaide Festival said on Thursday it was
retracting its earlier decision to exclude Abdel-Fattah “from
participating as a speaker at Adelaide Writers’ Week this year”. “We
have reversed the decision and will reinstate Dr Abdel-Fattah’s
invitation to speak at the next Adelaide Writers’ Week in 2027,” the
board said in a statement, apologising “unreservedly for the harm” it
had caused to her. “Intellectual and artistic freedom is a powerful
human right,” the board said, acknowledging that it had fallen “well
short” of upholding that right. Abdel-Fattah, an award-winning author of
11 novels, said in her own statement that she accepted the board’s
apology and would consider the invitation to participate next year. “I
accept this apology as acknowledgement of our right to speak publicly
and truthfully about the atrocities that have been committed against the
Palestinian people” and “a vindication of our collective solidarity and
mobilisation against anti-Palestinian racism, bullying and censorship”,
she said in a statement shared on social media.
Abdel-Fattah, who is also a lawyer and sociologist, said she would
agree to appear as a speaker “in a heartbeat” if Louise Adler, who
resigned as the director of Adelaide Writers’ Week in protest at the
board’s decision, “was the director again”, but said she had not yet
decided if she would accept the invitation to appear next year.
Abdel-Fattah also said the board’s initial decision to cancel her
participation highlighted problems, including “the need for urgent
antiracism education” and “the need for public institutions to have
safeguards against political interference by lobbyists”. Thursday’s
apology came a day after the board said in a separate statement that
this year’s Adelaide Writers’ Week “can no longer go ahead as scheduled”
after “many authors … announced they will no longer appear.” The
statement said the initial withdrawal of Abdel-Fattah’s invitation to
speak was “not about identity or dissent” but “around the breadth of
freedom of expression in our nation following Australia’s worst terror
attack in history”, in reference to the Bondi Beach attack, which killed
15 people at a Jewish celebration in December. Australian police have
said the two men accused of carrying out the deadly shooting were
“inspired” by ISIL (ISIS). The attack came five years after an
Australian gunman killed 51 Muslims while they were praying at their
mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand. Adler, who resigned as director of
the writers’ week after the board overrode her decision to invite
Abdel-Fattah, said this week that at least 180 authors had withdrawn
from this year’s programme in protest. The authors who said they would
no longer participate included prominent international and Australian
writers, such as Zadie Smith, M Gessen, Yanis Varoufakis, and Helen
Garner, as well as former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern.
Writing in The Guardian newspaper, Adler questioned the considerable
influence that “boards composed of individuals with little experience in
the arts” could wield over programming, and being “blind to the moral
implications of abandoning the principle of freedom of expression”.
Adler, who is Jewish, also expressed concern that “protests are being
outlawed, free speech is being constrained and politicians are rushing
through processes to ban phrases and slogans” in the wake of “the Bondi
atrocity”, with “alarming insouciance”.} Video - Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/15/australian-writers-festival-apologises-to-palestinian-author-after-boycott
Quds news - Jan 14, 2026
{Haaretz: US May Fund New Israeli Armored Vehicle Factory at Up to $2
Billion
Haaretz revealed that US taxpayers may fund up to $2 billion for a new
armored vehicle factory in Israel, as Washington’s military aid
increasingly shifts from weapons transfers to long-term war
infrastructure tied to Israel’s wars in Gaza and Lebanon.
Occupied Palestine (QNN)- A report by Israel’s Haaretz says the United
States may bankroll a new armored vehicle manufacturing plant in the
occupation state, with costs reaching up to $2 billion. The funding
would likely come from US military aid, according to internal American
government documents reviewed by the newspaper, including presentations
prepared by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The report says Israel’s
Defense Ministry recently unveiled a project known as the “Armored
Vehicle Production Acceleration Program.” The initiative aims to expand
production of Merkava tanks and Namer and Eitan armored personnel
carriers. Israeli officials cite heavy losses and intense wear during
the genocide in Gaza and the war on Lebanon as key reasons behind the
push. The Israeli ministry has estimated the project’s cost at more than
five billion shekels, or about $1.5 billion. It has not publicly
mentioned any foreign funding. Haaretz notes that this silence contrasts
with earlier Israeli statements about reducing reliance on US military
support. When asked by the newspaper, the US military said no formal
decision has yet been made on the project. Israel’s Defense Ministry
declined to comment on whether American funding is under consideration.
Despite the official denials, two documents from the US Army Corps of
Engineers suggest Washington would play a central role in financing the
plan. The documents, cited by Haaretz, indicate that the project remains
under discussion, even though no start date has been set. One
presentation, shown in October at a Middle East contractors’ conference,
described a new project in Israel involving the “planning, design, and
construction” of a “joint military systems manufacturing center.” The
estimated cost ranged between $1 billion and $2 billion. The
presentation said US military aid would fully cover the funding. A
second presentation in November referred again to a “joint military
systems manufacturing center.” It described the facility as a core
pillar of Israel’s armored vehicle production acceleration program. If
approved, the United States would issue official tenders for the
project. The structure would channel large sums of US aid, and
effectively US taxpayer money, into long-term military infrastructure
inside Israel. The report explains that the US Army Corps of Engineers
often manages military infrastructure projects for American allies using
US assistance funds. These projects extend beyond weapons purchases and
include air bases, naval facilities, and other strategic military sites.
Haaretz added that billions of dollars in US aid have already gone into
building and upgrading infrastructure for the Israeli military in recent
years. The latest proposal emerges as the current US-Israel military aid
agreement approaches its 2028 expiration. Under that deal, Israel is set
to receive $38 billion over ten years. Citing a US congressional study,
Haaretz reported that Washington has spent about $32 billion to support
Israel in just the past two years. That figure includes $21.7 billion in
direct assistance, along with a separate $26 billion military package
approved last year. Against this backdrop, Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu has said he supports gradually reducing US security
assistance, with the goal of ending it within a decade. His comments
come as criticism grows inside the United States over the scale of
taxpayer-funded military support for Israel amid the ongoing genocide in
Gaza and attacks in several countries.} Video - Source: https://qudsnen.co/post?id=67067&slug=haaretz-us-may-fund-new-israeli-armored-vehicle-factory-at-up-to-2-billion
!!!!
Al Nakba - 75
years of resistence - VICTORY is on its
way to the sea
Video found footage
shoots: Genocidal crime scene witnesses evidence

Videoscreen grabs: Under Siege Children Pay Tribute to The Fallen

Screengrabs: Stop starving Gaza and
Foreign Doctors Uncover Disturbing Pattern of Israeli Forces
Targeting Children

Fighting for Habiba
- Gazanan Pieta - Children suffering from malnutrition -
USA visas for medical
evacuation patients denied
LOOK AND ACT AGAINST instead of ALWAYS looking away!!!!
|
|
Gino d'Artali |
Women's Liberation
Front 2019/cryfreedom.net 2026