CRY FREEDOM.net
For the Iran 'Woman, Life, Freedom' Iran actual
news
For the 'Women's Arab
Spring 1.2 Revolt news
Special reports about the Afghanistan Women Revolt
For Syria: the
Fall of Assad and
aftermath |
|
SPECIAL
REPORTS
Dec wk4 --
Dec Wk3 P3 --
Dec Wk3 P2 --
Dec
Wk 3 -- Dec
Wk 2 P3
--
WK2 P 2
--
wk2
--
wk1 P 3 --
wk1 P 2 --
wk1 --
Nov wk5 P3 --
wk5 P2 --
wk5 --
wk4 P3 --
wk4 P2 --
Nwk4
Click here for an overview by week in 2024
Special reports:
Previous reports:
|
|
|
December 27 - 24, 2024 |
December 24 - 18, 2024 |
|
When one hurts or kills a women
one hurts or kills hummanity and is an antrocitie.
Gino d'Artali
and: My mother (1931-1997) always said to me <Mi
figlio, non esistono notizie <vecchie> perche puoi imparare qualcosa da
qualsiasi notizia.> Translated: <My son, there is no such thing as so
called 'old' news because you can learn something from any news.>
Gianna d'Artali.
Al Jazeera - Dec 23 2024 - by By Delaney Nolan
<<Millions in bonds for Israel put US states at odds with investment
policies
US states spend millions on Israeli investments but risk non-compliance
with their own policies.
Traffic moves along a road in front of tall buildings at night
The United States has long been Israel’s primary international backer,
lending it vast political, diplomatic and financial support. This has
only increased since Israel began its assault on Gaza last October, even
as it gradually expanded the parameters of its war, in which it is
widely accused by human rights groups of committing genocide. According
to Brown University’s Watson Institute, the US government provided
Israel with almost $18bn in weapons and military aid in the first year
of Israel's war. But Israel is also increasingly dependent on another
source of funds: bonds, bought by states and municipalities across the
US. Between October 7, 2023 - when the Palestinian group Hamas attacked
Israel and the latter subsequently began its war on Gaza – and April 18
this year, nearly three dozen states and counties have bought $1.7bn
worth of bonds, according to Israel Bonds, a US-based company that
raises foreign funds for Israel. This money has gone straight into
Israel's general fund, where it can then be funnelled into Israel’s
ballooning military budget. An email from Israel Bonds to an Ohio county
treasurer noted the bonds were used in part to "refund the United States
Government for security equipment". The world's single largest purchaser
of Israel's war bonds is Palm Beach County - the wealthy Florida county
home to President-elect Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence. Palm Beach
holds a startling $700m worth of Israel bonds - a loan large enough to
cover the purchase of multiple F-15 fighter jets. But now, after more
than a year of an escalating and internationally condemned conflict,
Israel's economy is stumbling. Tens of thousands of Israeli firms are
predicted to shut this year, the budget deficit has ballooned from 4
percent to 8 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), direct investment
has fallen about 30 percent and US rating agencies have downgraded
Israel's credit. All this means that when local treasurers buy Israeli
bonds, they increasingly risk violating their own policies, which
require them to invest taxpayer money in a responsible way. In fact, a
review by Al Jazeera found that at least two states appear to face
violating their state treasury investment policies if they buy more
Israeli bonds. At least four other states that have bought Israeli bonds
since October 2023 could also face non-compliance if Israel's credit is
lowered further.
A risky investment
When a state or county buys Israeli bonds, they essentially loan the
Israeli government money with an agreement that they will get those
funds back in an agreed-upon number of years, plus interest. After
October 7, the staff of the underwriter for Israel Bonds directly
contacted treasurers in Florida, Louisiana, Ohio, and other states.
Those treasurers quickly bought tens of millions of dollars worth of
Israeli bonds. But as Israel's economy weakens, it appears increasingly
difficult to justify these investments. In April, Fitch, one of the
three leading US credit rating agencies, warned that the conflict could
"lead to a large deterioration of Israel’s credit metrics". By August,
Fitch had downgraded Israel's credit. The next month, another agency,
Moody's, also downgraded Israel’s credit rating to Baa1 for the first
time in its history, and in October, the third agency, S&P, downgraded
Israel as well. Moody's even warned of further downgrades in light of
Israel’s conflict with the Lebanese group Hezbollah. A ceasefire between
Israel and Hezbollah was agreed to in late November, but Fitch warned
"the ceasefire is likely to be fragile", and predicted a rise in
Israel's 2025 budget deficit. All three major credit rating agencies
project a negative outlook for Israel's credit. All together, it
indicates Israel is less able to pay back its loans. This places some US
states in a precarious position, as some state investment policies
specify that treasurers can only invest in foreign entities if they are
above specific credit ratings. Al Jazeera has found that two states -
Florida and Nevada - may face violating their investment policies if
they buy more Israel bonds. The Treasury policies of both states require
foreign obligations to have ratings of AA- or higher from at least one
credit rating agency. Israel Bonds stopped meeting that standard in
April. Florida's Chief Financial Officer last announced purchases of
Israeli bonds in March, bringing the state's holdings to $250m. Nevada
bought Israeli bonds last October, according to the CEO of Israel Bonds.
Neither the Florida nor Nevada Treasury office responded to requests for
comment. If Israel's credit is further downgraded, at least four other
US states may also have to halt purchases of Israeli bonds: Ohio,
Georgia, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. Rachel Ziemba, a geo-economic and
country risk expert and adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New
American Security, said that further purchases of Israeli bonds would
appear to violate these states' policies after she reviewed the policy
documents. "Reading their guidelines suggests that it's in violation...
they would have to sell their Israeli bonds especially if there are
further downgrades," Ziemba said, though she added that state investment
committees could also decide to make exceptions.
"Ultimately I think they're doing it [buying Israeli bonds] for
political and what they believe are moral reasons [but] given the credit
rating outlook, it’s probably something that will come up more and more,
and probably there will be more legal cases around this issue." Daniel
Garrett, an assistant professor of finance at the Wharton School of the
University of Pennsylvania, was more cautious. He noted that Florida had
multiple portfolios, some of which have higher rating requirements, and
that it was unclear which portfolio the Israeli bonds sit in. Garrett
added that all state policies tend to give investment managers
flexibility when a security falls out of compliance, and "getting your
credit downgraded doesn’t lead to immediate divestment, even if it
doesn't meet these portfolio standards any more". Still, he added, "If I
saw increasing investments in a security that has a declining and no
longer complying credit rating, that would be out of line with these
policies". If an investment falls out of compliance, Florida's portfolio
manager must make a written request to hold the security for longer than
90 days. The request is then voted on by an Investment Working Group. Al
Jazeera has filed a public record request to determine whether such an
exchange has taken place, but has yet to receive a response.
Political investments
The bonds' declining returns also undermine the claims made by some
state treasurers who say the purchases are based on sound financial
reasons, rather than political ones. The Louisiana treasurer, John
Fleming, for example, who has bought $25m worth of Israeli bonds since
last October, said the purchase "is based on sound financial
principles". Yet, Fleming bought $10m worth of Israeli bonds in April,
and again in August - both months in which Israel's credit was
downgraded. With Moody's latest downgrade, the bonds are also now
bumping up against Louisiana's legal requirements.
A look at the data challenges the idea that Israeli bonds are sound
investments. Within Louisiana's portfolio, "when we aggregate all of the
other bonds together, they're improving in value since September.
Whereas the Israel bonds have actually decreased in value since
September", says Ayyub Ibrahim, a data scientist at the Berkeley
Institute for Data Science, who examined Louisiana’s holding of Israeli
bonds. "Israel bonds are very, very, very important in terms of the
ongoing war," added Ibrahim. The data he reviewed "goes to the argument
that not only are these bonds immoral - they’re also financially not
advantageous, given you're losing money on them." Other treasurers have
openly indicated they are using taxpayer funds to buy Israeli bonds for
ideological reasons. Palm Beach County Comptroller Joseph Abruzzo has
repeatedly referred to the need to protect and support Israel as a
justification for the purchase. This, too, could be a violation of state
law: Several states that hold Israel bonds - including Florida - have
passed legislation that forbids treasurers from making investments for
social or political reasons. Abruzzo has – despite his overt backing for
Israel – stressed that the investments were not "done for a political
purpose whatsoever".
Legal challenge
As local governments use taxpayer money, they typically invest only in
safe, reliable assets. But in Palm Beach County, Abruzzo has invested a
startling 16 percent of the county's portfolio in Israeli bonds - a
highly unusual move, and in excess of its legal maximum of 15 percent.
That cap was increased from 10 percent by the county in March. Last
spring, lawyers in Palm Beach filed a suit arguing that Abruzzo had
violated both state law and a local investment policy that he
spearheaded, which says Israel bonds can be bought as long as they are
rated A by S&P and Moody's - a standard Israel fell below in September.
Lydia Ghuman is one of the legal researchers working on the lawsuit. She
notes that the bonds, bought with property tax money, amount to roughly
the same as Palm Beach County's budget deficit of $730m. "Florida is
going through a housing crisis right now. We're going through a huge
workers' rights crisis," stressed Ghuman. "There's things that need to
be funded here, and this is where the money should be," she said. She
added that she would like to see funds "reinvested in local needs
determined by constituents". Financial experts cited in the complaint
note that it was very unusual for a city to invest such a high
percentage of its portfolio in any single entity, never mind a foreign
bond.
Justin Marlowe, a research professor at the University of Chicago, said
that he did not know of another jurisdiction that had such a high
percentage of holdings in a single type of investment. "It does
represent a much greater concentration of risk in any portfolio for a
public entity that I've seen in a long time," Marlowe was quoted in the
complaint note as saying. Garrett, the University of Pennsylvania
assistant professor, noted that if a security falls out of compliance,
investment managers are typically legally required to disclose that to a
state investment board. Ghuman, the legal researcher on the lawsuit,
stated that, according to public records, Abruzzo had not made this
required disclosure. Abruzzo has moved to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing
among other points that he should have sovereign immunity, which
protects government employees from liability. "No for-profit company
investing its own money would want to dump that much” in a foreign bond,
said Ghuman, "but he gets to invest constituents' taxpayer money".
"That's where it's coming from - it comes from property taxes, so it's
no risk to him personally. And it is unusual. It’s very odd… they
actually decreased their investment in US Treasury bonds, which are
earning more money, and are more stable, and are beating inflation, to
put [funds] into Israel bonds, which are not beating inflation, so
they're not making market return on the investment, and they’re more
unstable, and have a lower credit rating." Kathy Burstein, Abruzzo's
chief communications officer, said in an email that the county has not
bought Israeli bonds since March 2024. The office declined to comment
further, in light of the pending lawsuit. As taxpayer funds are sent to
prop up Israel's war effort, some argue the entire arrangement is in
violation of federal law. In April, the organisation Democracy for the
Arab World Now (DAWN) wrote to the US Department of Justice, the
Security Exchange Commission and the State Department, urging them to
classify the Israel Development Corporation, the organisation that sells
Israeli bonds, as a foreign agent. Israeli bond profits "get handed out
largely to [Israeli] government coalition agreements, which oftentimes
are where budgets for settlements come from", explained Michael
Omer-Man, DAWN's director of research for Israel-Palestine, referring to
illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. For this reason,
he said, "Anybody investing in Israel bonds is risking violating the
settler sanctions", which Biden issued in February and expanded in
November, amid an increase in settler violence against Palestinians.
DAWN has not received any response to its letters to federal agencies.
Campaigns to stop the purchase of Israeli war bonds are ongoing in
Illinois, Ohio, Louisiana and Florida. In the European Union, all
Israeli bond sales go through the Central Bank of Ireland, where calls
are growing for the bank to halt these sales amid accusations they
violate both EU law and an International Court of Justice ruling that
the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal.
The Israel Development Corporation and other underwriters of Israeli
bonds "are companies that are controlled by foreign governments and
advancing their political and other interests", said Omer-Man - but
"they're not used to having to answer for these things".>>
SOURCE: AL JAZEERA:
https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/12/23/millions-in-bonds-for-israel-put-us-states-at-odds-with-investment-policies
|
Gino d'Artali |
Women's
Liberation Front 2019/cryfreedom.net 2024